• Grocery retail
  • UX strategy & research
  • Enterprise tools

Whole Foods Market

The Smart GIG policy platform shown on a desktop display

Modernizing legal document management.

Whole Foods Market managed its company-wide employee policy, internally known as the General Information Guide (GIG), through mostly paper-based workflows with no digital source of truth. More than 20,000 Team Members searched corporate policy every week, and it lived as a flat list of links with no way to sort, search or confirm that the current version was seen.

Without a way to efficiently create legal documents and accurately track Team Member attestations, the existing workflows exposed the company to significant legal risk.

The goal was to make employee policies easily accessible for busy Team Members while enabling the legal team to track policy acknowledgements in one place. I designed Smart GIG, a consolidated legal document authoring and viewing platform that reduced an estimated $1 million in annual legal risk.

Timeline
March 2024 to September 2024
Role
Requirements gathering, conceptualization and visual design
Tools
  • Figma
  • Innerview
Worked with
  • Project Manager
  • Lead Software Architect
  • Associate Software Architect

From whiteboard to build-ready

Workshops with the Whole Foods legal team and a sample of Team Members mapped the future state on a wall. Weekly reviews turned it into a specification a developer could build.

01Discover4 sections

A workshop with the people writing the policy.

To gain a contextual understanding of the existing workflows and the suite of enterprise tools used in legal document authoring and publishing, I conducted an insight-gathering workshop with the Whole Foods Policy and Compliance Team.

The session established how corporate policy was written, approved and distributed across the company.

Insights gathered from the Policy and Compliance Team workshop
Insights gathered from the Policy and Compliance Team workshop.

20 interviews with the people reading the policy.

More than 20,000 Whole Foods Team Members search and visit corporate policies every week. I conducted one-on-one user interviews with a sample of 20 Team Members to gain insight into how they access, view and acknowledge policy documentation.

Insights gathered from in-store Team Member interviews
Insights gathered from the in-store Team Member interviews.

A PDF behind a long list of links.

The Whole Foods General Information Guide (GIG) is the company-wide employee policy document. For the authoring team, the GIG is referred to as a policy set, which is broken down into a granular set of individual policies.

The PDF version of the GIG was accessible from the Whole Foods intranet, Innerview. Individual policies were represented by a lengthy list of selectable links, with no ability to search or sort.

Anatomy of the General Information Guide: a policy set broken down into individual policies
Anatomy of the General Information Guide. One policy set, broken down into individual policies.
A page of the existing PDF-based General Information Guide
A page of the existing PDF-based General Information Guide
The existing PDF-based General Information Guide.
A page of the existing PDF-based General Information Guide

The current state of authoring and viewing.

To map the current policy authoring and publishing workflows, I collaborated with developers, project managers and end users to visualize the existing systems and identify inefficiencies.

User insights from the mapping sessions highlighted how critical the authoring and viewing workflows were within each role.

Current state user flow for the policy authoring experience
Current state of the authoring experience.
Current state user flow for the policy viewing experience
Current state of the viewing experience.

02Define4 sections

Eight themes, split between authoring and viewing.

User pain points were grouped thematically by contextual similarity and separated between the policy authoring and policy viewing experiences. Each experience distilled into four themes.

Authoring pain points

  1. Manual, paper-based policy authoring methods
  2. Inability to accurately track Team Member policy acknowledgements
  3. No single digital solution to facilitate the authoring, acknowledgement tracking and viewing of legal policy documentation
  4. Lack of granular control in policy publishing, such as regional policy versioning

Viewing pain points

  1. Manual, paper-based or PDF policy access methods
  2. Inability to ensure the current policy version is viewed
  3. Constant acknowledgement requests for even minor policy changes
  4. Separate systems for policy viewing and acknowledgement
Affinity map of policy authoring pain points
Authoring pain points, grouped by theme.
Affinity map of policy viewing pain points
Viewing pain points, grouped by theme.

Built for the people writing the policy.

An analysis of the authoring pain points emphasized four features centered on policy document authoring, management and acknowledgement tracking.

  • 01

    Centralized digital policy management

    Policy authors want a consolidated, digital solution to streamline policy authoring, tracking and distribution, allowing real-time collaboration and updating across all touchpoints.

  • 02

    Acknowledgement tracking system

    Policy authors want automated acknowledgement tracking, notifications and compliance escalation to accurately request and log Team Member policy acknowledgements.

  • 03

    Regional policy publishing

    Policy authors want the ability to specify region-specific policy elements without creating an entirely separate General Information Guide.

  • 04

    Document version control

    Policy authors want robust version control to clearly manage edits, track changes and publish updates.

Built for every Team Member use case.

An analysis of the viewing pain points emphasized three features centered on policy access, viewing and acknowledgement submissions.

  • 01

    Centralized and current policy access

    Team Members want a centralized, digital repository of policies to easily search and view the latest policy versions.

  • 02

    Smart acknowledgement system

    Team Members want to review and acknowledge the specific changes made to a policy without re-acknowledging the entire policy document.

  • 03

    Enhanced experience across devices

    Team Members want a user-friendly policy viewing interface optimized for both desktop and mobile devices.

The future state, settled before any screen was designed.

I facilitated in-person whiteboarding workshops with the Whole Foods legal team and a sample of Team Members to develop proposed future-state user flows for both the authoring and the viewing experiences.

Policy sets, categories and the relationships between them were defined on the wall, which fixed the structure of the platform ahead of any screen. The output of each session was a wall of open questions grouped by theme.

A whiteboard covered in future-state user flows, policy set sketches and open questions mapped during a workshop
The board at the end of a session. The open questions in orange were carried into the next pass.
Future-state user flow for the authoring experience, from creating a policy through drafting, preview and review to publication

Scroll sideways to follow the flow

Authoring experience. The authoring flow was mapped from a blank policy to a published one. A policy is created inside its policy set, written in repeatable section blocks and checked in a preview beside the editor. Status, version, active date range and review date are set before it is submitted for review and published to Team Members.
Future-state user flow for the viewing experience, from opening the General Information Guide through finding, reading and acknowledging a policy

Scroll sideways to follow the flow

Viewing experience. The viewing flow was mapped from the moment a Team Member opens the General Information Guide. A policy is reached through search or through its policy set, read in its current version and acknowledged in the same place it is read, which gives the company a record of who has seen it.
The combined future-state map for the authoring and viewing experiences
The optimized future state, with the authoring and viewing experiences mapped together.

03Develop4 sections

One fidelity step at a time.

I explored solutions through rapid prototyping. The work climbed one fidelity step at a time: marker sketches, rough wireframes, a clickable prototype and a build-ready specification. Each pass answered a narrower question than the one before it.

Four passes at the policy authoring screen stacked in sequence: a marker sketch, a low fidelity wireframe, a mid fidelity layout and a fully specified interface
Four passes at the same authoring screen, stacked in the order of fidelity in which they were made.
  • Pass 01 · Rapid sketching

    Marker on a board

    Minutes per idea, drawn live in the room with the legal team. The sketches settled what a policy set contains and which sections exist.

  • Pass 02 · Low fidelity

    Boxes and labels

    The first pass in a design tool. Grey boxes and placeholder titles answered how an author finds a policy and attaches it to a category, before type or colour were introduced.

  • Pass 03 · Interactive prototype

    Structure you could click through

    Navigation, policy parameters and the editor were placed relative to each other and wired together, so reviewers moved through the flow in the weekly sessions. The layout was settled here.

  • Pass 04 · High fidelity

    A build-ready specification

    Every field, state and control was drawn at production fidelity: statuses, version pickers, active and review date ranges and repeatable section blocks.

The iterative design process, from rapid sketching through to high fidelity
The iterative process, from rapid sketching through to high fidelity.

The screens changed after every session.

Early sketches and low fidelity wireframes defined the structure of the future Smart GIG platform. I conducted weekly review sessions in person with end users, project managers and developers. Low fidelity wireframes were walked screen by screen, and the feedback from each session was drawn before the next one.

Early feedback from policy authors set the shape of four screens: the policy library, the manage policies table, the create policy form and the dual-pane editor. Running the reviews with developers in the room kept every decision inside what the platform could support.

The Smart GIG home screen: policy sets, expandable policies and a search across all of them
The policy library, as a Team Member sees it. Policies are grouped into sets, each one expanding in place, with a search across every set above them.
The manage policies table: every policy row with its status, last edited, effective, published and review dates
Manage policies, as an author sees it. Status, last edited, effective, published and review date sit on every row, with bulk actions above the table. Authors asked to see the state of the whole library in one view.
The create policy screen: policy metadata above repeatable text section blocks and an author notes block
Creating a policy. Name, status, version, active date range and review date sit above repeatable text section blocks, with a separate block for author notes. Authors add and reorder the blocks.
The dual-pane editor: a live policy preview on the left and the policy editor with its fields and section blocks on the right
The dual-pane editor. The preview sits beside the editor, so an author reads what a Team Member will read while writing it. This pane came directly out of a review session.
Draft wireframes from the weekly review sessions
Draft wireframes from the weekly review sessions. User feedback guided the placement of critical UI elements to match the authoring workflow.

High fidelity, built from existing components.

After validating the draft wireframes, I integrated components from the Whole Foods enterprise design system into high fidelity mobile and desktop mockups.

Design system components streamlined the design and build process and kept the mobile and desktop mockups consistent with brand standards.

The transition from wireframe to high fidelity mobile mockups
From validated wireframes to high fidelity mobile mockups.
Components from the Whole Foods enterprise design system
Components from the Whole Foods enterprise design system.
The design system behind the platform: components, their states and the patterns built from them
The components behind the platform, drawn once with their states defined. New screens are assembled from existing parts.

Team Members asked for policies at a glance.

Iterative user feedback guided the placement of UI elements in the viewing experience mockups. Insights from regular usability sessions informed the content hierarchy and the touchpoints.

I initially proposed an expander-based homepage, where a Team Member selects a policy set expander to view its nested policies. User feedback showed a preference for an at-a-glance policy viewing experience without expanding a policy set first, and the homepage was redesigned around it.

Iterations of the viewing experience mockups, shaped by usability session feedback
Iterations of the viewing experience, shaped by feedback from the usability sessions.
The proposed General Information Guide homepage with policy set expanders
Proposed. Policies nested inside policy set expanders.
The revised General Information Guide homepage with every policy visible at a glance
Revised. Every policy visible at a glance.

04Deliver5 sections

Tested against the job, then handed to build.

High fidelity prototypes were tested with Team Members and the legal team before development began. Visual design ran through to launch on the internal platform, shipping seven features across the authoring and viewing experiences.

The specification went to development as a walked flow, with every state and every transition between them drawn in place.

The final Smart GIG user flow: a Team Member moves from the Innerview home screen into the General Information Guide, opens a policy set, reads a policy and acknowledges the current version

Scroll sideways to follow the flow

The shipped flow, walked end to end: finding a policy set, reading the current version of a policy and acknowledging it.

Individual policies, nested inside policy sets.

The policy and policy set editor consolidates policy management. Authors create individual policy documents and nest them within larger policy sets.

Authors manage content, target specific regions, control document versions and navigate between policies from the same editor.

The create policy set screen
Creating a policy set.
The create policy screen
Creating a policy.

The published page, shown while it is written.

The live preview editor displays real-time policy updates alongside the editing interface. Authors visualize policy edits as they make them, which reduces editing errors.

The live preview editor for a policy set
The live preview editor for a policy set.
The live preview editor for a policy
The live preview editor for a policy.

One repository, with version control.

Policies are organized within a centralized repository. Authors manage, update and track individual policy versions and group them into structured folders.

Policy authors always edit the latest policy document and Team Members always access the latest approved version, which aids compliance and reduces legal risk across Whole Foods Market.

The manage policies table
The manage policies table.
Managing policy versions and folders
Policy versions, grouped into structured folders.

A searchable, role-specific table of contents.

The General Information Guide homepage is the interface for accessing essential policies and information.

The GIG was designed for scannability. It features a device-responsive, searchable, role-specific table of contents, so Team Members find the most relevant, up-to-date content.

The General Information Guide table of contents on mobile
The table of contents on mobile.
The General Information Guide table of contents on desktop
The table of contents on desktop.

A single source of truth

One platform to author individual policy documents and nest them within larger policy sets, with control over content, regional targeting, versioning and navigation. A centralized repository keeps every Team Member on the latest approved version.

The policy set editor with live preview on desktop
The policy set editor. A live preview runs beside the draft, so an author sees the published page while writing it.
A Team Member using the platform on a tablet
In the store, on the tablet already on the floor.
The General Information Guide on mobile
The General Information Guide on a phone, the device every Team Member already carries.
The policy acknowledgement flow on mobile
Acknowledgement sits inside the reading flow, so the record of who has seen a policy is made where the policy is read.
The policy region selector on mobile
Regional targeting. A policy set is scoped so a Team Member sees the policies that apply where they work.
  1. ~$1M

    Estimated annual legal risk reduced by digitizing paper-based policy workflows.

  2. 20,000+

    Team Members served, accessing current policy every week.

  3. 7

    Features shipped across the authoring and viewing experiences.

  4. 1

    Digital source of truth, replacing manual paper workflows.

Next case study

Mark Spain Real Estate